|
| 1
|
| 0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments |
| Published: Jun.18.2006 @ 10:33 am
| Last edited: Jul.29.2006 @ 5:31 am |
I originally presented this article, "The Design of Hybrid Flexible Assembly Systems", as a guest speaker at the 6th International Conference on Assembly Automation ...
There is a requirement for a special kind of system to assemble
products required in modest volumes with a degree of variety. A
system which is as cost effective and efficient as hard automation,
whilst providing the flexibility of manual assembly, is called a
flexible assembly system. Within such a system, certain product parts
may be required at a different rate to other parts. Some operations may
require the flexibility and dexterity of a robot, or even manual
labour. The resultant system would be a hybrid of many methods of
assembly. This article recommends a technique to be used for the design
of such a system, with the aid of a case study.
INTRODUCTION
The factory cost of a product is the addition of the manufacturing cost
(e.g. casting, moulding, turning) and the assembly cost (e.g. manual,
automatic, robotic). Industrial engineers continually seek new
methods to reduce the factory cost of products. The current trend of
exploiting cheap labour in developing nations, through “offshoring”
creates a challenge for domestic manufacturers in the developed
nations. Between 40 and 60 percent of the factory cost for many
products is associated with the labour content. The majority of this
cost is incurred during assembly. There are three reasons for this
uneven split between labour costs in manufacturing and assembly.
(i) Manufacturing operations are usually done by, or with the aid of, a
machine, i.e. turning, milling, drilling, etc. The manufacturing
systems designer does not have the wide choice of the assembly systems
designer because some degree of mechanisation must be used. It is then
a logical extension to further automate the manufacturing process to
reduce labour costs.
(ii) New processes have been developed which eliminate many
manufacturing operations. Powder metallurgy is an example of such a
process.
(iii) Most products are designed to be assembled manually. This
often means that components are of such a design that they cannot be
handled by automatic feeders. Additionally, many assembly
insertion operations are too complex to be automated.
The assembly process is one of the last production processes to be
successfully automated by the industrial engineer. However, as much of
the factory cost of a product is incurred during assembly, it is this
area where great productivity improvements can be made. The design of
the assembly system should be undertaken with due consideration of the
design of the manufacturing system and of the design of the product.
The design of the assembly system, manufacturing system and product
should be considered integrally. These three components, when combined,
should create a product having the lowest factory cost at the desired
level of quality. The design of a product and it’s associated
production system is an iterative process, whereby product design
features dictate the design of the production system and the
capabilities of the production system determine the product design. The
extent to which these actions can be carried out is only limited by the
commitment of a manufacturer to a particular production system and
product design.
|
|
| 0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments |
| Published: Jun.17.2006 @ 3:12 pm
|
A company may be already committed to a certain manufacturing system if
there is prvious investment in capital equipment and tooling.
Additionally, the external dimensions, performance or appearance of the
product may be unchangeable. If a product is only part of a much larger
assembly, the effect of changing a critical dimension may have
expensive consequences for the rest of the much larger assembly. The
performance of the re-designed product must be as good as, if not
better than, the original design. The product may be one where visual
appearance plays an important part in it’s acceptability in the market
place. All of these factors place limitations on the engineer being
able to specify the optimum product design and production system for
that design.
It is easier to design the most economic assembly system for a product
prior to commercial manufacture. In this case, there won’t be an
inherited investment in manufacturing equipment or tooling, and the
product design won’t have been finalised. If the product is well
established, and has been produced for many years, the assembly systems
engineer may be limited to a re-design of the assembly system alone.
This is because a re-designed product may require expensive design
modifications to the tooling used for the manufacture of the product
parts. In these situations, a hybrid assembly system is required to
meet the product requirements. A hybrid assembly system uses a mixture
of methods during assembly of the product.
THE COMPONENTS OF A HYBRID FLEXIBLE ASSEMBLY SYSTEM
There are six methods of assembly and the simplest form is MANUAL
ASSEMBLY. For high volume production, the operatives usually work
on an assembly line. Other forms of manual assembly are a single worker
assembling a complete product and groups of workers assembling a
portion of the product.
For a more limited product range, a MANUAL ASSISTED method may be used,
whereby workers are assisted by mechanical devices, such as automated
parts feeders. The feeders present the parts to the worker in an
ordered manner and the assembly time is reduced by eliminating the time
taken to separate the parts from bulk random orientation. The reduction
in assembly time is the basis for the economic justification of these
devices.
The third form of assembly uses AUTOMATIC INDEXING assembly machines.
These are rotary or in-line systems with a number of
workstations. Automatic feeders supply components to workheads
and they assemble the part to the fixture or part-built assembly. The
workstations are ‘special-purpose’ and are dedicated to the assembly of
only one product. Production volumes need to be high for the economic
justification of these machines. Component quality must also be high to
avoid excessive downtime caused by components jamming, etc.
The efficiency of an AUTOMATIC FREE-FLOW assembly machine is less
dependent upon component quality. Transfer of work pieces
between workstations is non-synchronous. There are
small buffer stocks between each workstation and other workstations may
operate whilst one is stopped due to a fault caused by, for example, a
defective part.
The AUTOMATIC PROGRAMMABLE assembly machine has a non-synchronous
transfer line and programmable workstations to assemble the parts,
which are presented to the workheads by automatic feeders or, in the
case of difficult components, part magazines may be used. The workheads
execute one, or a number of, operation(s). Different computer programs,
for each series of assembly processes, give the flexibility to assemble
a variety of product styles on one assembly machine.
Robotic assembly is used for the assembly of products with large
product variety, required in low volumes. Assembly operations are
carried out by a robot which, itself, transfers the completed product
onto the next operation.
|
|
| 0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments |
| Published: Jun.16.2006 @ 12:57 pm
| Last edited: Jul.29.2006 @ 5:33 am |
THE DESIGN OF HYBRID FLEXIBLE ASSEMBLY SYSTEMS
The assembly process has two constituent parts and these are; the
handling of components and the insertion of components. The design
features of a part must be examined to decide if it can be
automatically handled automatically or if it must be handled manually
or placed in magazines. Similarly, the insertion process must be
analysed to decide what type of workhead is required.
Various organisations have developed procedures that help the designer
to estimate how easy it is to handle and orientate components by
assigning a handling code to each part. The maximum feed rate and
relative cost of the feeding method can then be estimated from this
code. The parts which would require expensive automatic feeders or
which could not be fed at the required feed rate can be
identified. These parts must then be handled manually or in
magazines/pallets. Additionally, certain parts cannot be handled
automatically because they have other bad feeding qualities, e.g. they
may be flexible or too light. The previously mentioned estimation
systems also help the system designer to forecast the relative cost of
the workhead required to insert a part into a part-built assembly.
Those operations which require a complex path of insertion, or a large
thrust, require more expensive workheads than for simpler operations. A
list of parts (with their associated automated handling codes) and a
list of operations (with their allocated automatic insertion codes) can
be constructed from the preceding information.
If the product parts are listed in order of increasing handling
difficulty levels then the most economical method of feeding a part to
the workhead can be determined. Parts with low handling difficulty
levels are fed by conventional vibratory feeders and, as the difficulty
level increases, specially designed feeders/magazines/pallets/manual
handling are used. The relationship between the handling difficulty
level and the type of feeder to be used depends upon the required
return on investment for the equipment.
The insertion operations can also be listed in order of insertion
difficulty levels to determine the most economical method of insertion
of a part into a part-built assembly. Greater difficulty levels can
mean that the equipment is more expensive and, for assembly robots,
more degrees of freedom are required for an insertion operation. If the
difficulty level is too high then it’s necessary to employ manual
workers for some operations.
When an assembly system is designed for a new product, the cost of
parts handling and insertion can be reduced through re-design of the
product. It’s usually not viable for an existing product to be
re-designed, because of the tooling modification cost in the
manufacture of the parts. Inevitably, therefore, the most economical
method of assembly is limited to the existing product design, without
design efficiency improvements.
The assembly handling and insertion codes determine which feeding
method and insertion device are most appropriate for each part and
operation. The part-built assembly has to be transported to each
workstation between operations. This will either be synchronous or
non-synchronous motion. Synchronous machines are generally less
expensive than non-synchronous types, but they are limited by how many
parts can be assembled on one machine. This is due to downtime and the
space available.
It is desirable to construct a product from as many sub-assemblies as
possible to achieve a high overall efficiency of the assembly system.
These sub-assemblies should be common to all product styles, within the
family of products. The variety can then be created in the final
assembly of the product. If this approach is adopted then
sub-assemblies will be required at a rate which is enough to justify
the use of automatic indexing machines having dedicated workheads. The
output from these machines can then be sent to the final assembly line
via free transfer lines, to create a buffer stock of sub-assemblies.
The buffer stock is necessary to minimise the effect of any indexing
machine downtime. |
|
| 0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments |
| Published: Jun.15.2006 @ 10:01 pm
| Last edited: Jul.29.2006 @ 5:38 am |
CASE STUDY - THE DESIGN OF A HYBRID FLEXIBLE ASSEMBLY SYSTEM FOR SPEEDOMETERS
The case study describes how a hybrid flexible assembly system was
designed for the assembly of a mechanical drag cup speedometer. This
type of speedometer is the most widely used today and its design has
not changed over the last 50 years. If there is already a heavy
investment in capital equipment for the manufacture of the individual
parts then it is not economical to re-design the product for automatic
assembly.
The input shaft of the speedometer carries a permanent magnet. The
flexible drive shaft from the engine drives the input shaft, thus
setting up a rotating magnetic field. A metallic cup is situated in
this field and is continuously connected to the pointer. As the input
shaft rotates, a torque is produced at the spindle, which is
proportional to the speed of the input shaft. The spindle is free to
rotate and yet is restrained by a delicate hairspring. The spring rate
is chosen to be linear over the range of the spindle angular
deflection, thus providing a pointer movement that is proportional to
the input shaft speed. The hairspring returns the pointer to zero when
the vehicle is at rest. A series of gears from the input shaft convert
the rotation of the flexible drive shaft to a rotation of the odometer
wheels. Gear ratios typically vary from 600:1 to 2000:1.
There are 25 parts used in the assembly of the speedometer and more
than 50 product styles can be obtained by a variation in the design of
six parts. These are the dial, second worm gear, third worm gear,
odometer sub-assembly, hairspring and pointer sub-assembly. The total
annual production volume for all the styles is in excess of one million
units. An individual style may be required in volumes between 200 and
200,000 per year. Clearly, these volumes require an assembly system
which has flexibility to handle such large demand fluctuations.
The speedometer consists of four sub-assemblies and twelve parts. The
dial sub-assembly has three parts, the first worm sub-assembly has six
parts, the speed cup sub-assembly has two parts and the frame
sub-assembly has two parts. Each sub-assembly is a self-contained unit
and does not require any holding of the parts for stability between
workstations.
Synchronous assembly machines are most economical for the high volume
assembly of a small number of parts. Each sub-assembly contains six or
less parts, making them most suitable for this method of assembly.
A rotary indexing machine for the FRAME SUB-ASSEMBLY is used for the
assembly of two components. There are eight workstations on this
machine to allow for non-value adding operations in addition to the
direct insertion process. The handling difficulty level of the bearing
means that it is presented by a specially designed feeder. It is
impregnated with oil and this doesn’t allow the part to be handled by a
conventional vibratory feeder. The frame cannot be handled by an
automatic feeder because it is large and has no symmetry about any
axis. The complex shape of the frame means that it cannot be magazined
and it is, therefore, palletised. A robot places the frames onto the
machine because they are picked from several hundred pallet locations.
The rotary indexing machine for the SPEED CUP SUB-ASSEMBLY uses a
simple pressing operation to secure the speed cup to the spindle. There
are four workstations for; the assembly of the spindle to the fixture,
the speed cup to the fixture, the pressing of the speed cup onto the
spindle and an output station. Both parts are fed by vibratory bowl
feeders and inserted by dedicated workheads.
The FIRST WORM SUB-ASSEMBLY consists of six components, all of which
are fed by vibratory bowl feeders. The indexing machine uses ten
dedicated workstations to complete the sub-assembly. The first worm
shaft is burnished before final assembly. This operation is
executed after the rotary indexing machine, on a free-transfer line.
Two burnishing stations are used, in parallel, to achieve the cycle
time. The free transfer line also provides a buffer stock of completed
sub-assemblies before the final assembly line.
The rotary indexing machine for the DIAL SUB-ASSEMBLY assembles three
parts. Only the pointer stop can be automatically fed and so the dial
and label use special feeding methods. Different designs of dials are
used to create product variety. However, only the print face and
diameter of the dial are variable and the dial is picked from a
magazine, on the reverse face, by a dedicated workhead. The label is
applied by a conventional labelling device.
All sub-assembly indexing machines are linked to the final assembly
machine by free-transfer lines, for overall system efficiency. This
also creates space for auxiliary operations to be carried out on the
sub-assemblies before final assembly. The speed cup sub-assembly is
dynamically balanced before final assembly, and this is done with the
aid of two robots. The programmability of a robot is required for the
'decision making' operations of this process. Feedback from the
balancing machine determines whether the sub-assembly has to be
balanced more than once or, in the case of it being excessively out of
balance, it is rejected.
There are twenty six workstations used for the FINAL ASSEMBLY of the
speedometer, making it necessary to use a free-transfer linear machine
to allow buffer stocks to be created between each workstation, to
maintain high system efficiency. Of the twelve parts used during final
assembly; seven parts are handled by conventional vibratory bowl
feeders, two parts by multiple vibratory feeders, one part by pallet,
one part by manual handling and the remaining part by actual
manufacture on the assembly line.
The parts which are fed by vibratory feeders are small components with
either useable symmetry or definite asymmetry. These are inserted into
the part-built assembly by dedicated workheads. |
|
| 0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments |
| Published: Jun.14.2006 @ 5:49 pm
| Last edited: Jun.14.2006 @ 10:52 am |
The two parts to be handled by multiple vibratory feeders are the
second worm gear and the third worm gear. These parts are changed to
produce the various gear ratios used to create different product
styles. The disruption to production, during product changeover, is
minimised by using a group of vibratory feeders which deliver one
particular second or third worm. The pick up point of the workhead is
thus quickly changed to the output of a particular feeder for the
assembly of a different style.
The jewel--plate sub-assembly is a large and delicate part which cannot
be fed by an automatic feeder. It can, however, be
palletised. A robot picks up the jewel-plate sub-assembly from
the pallet and inserts it into the part-built assembly. The
operation is relatively complex and an operator has been retained at
this station to assist the robot when difficulties arise.
The hairspring is a delicate part that can’t be handled by an automatic
feeder. The insertion process is also difficult because the end of the
spring is welded to a stub on the jewel plate. This part is assembled
manually by two workers in parallel, because of these difficulties.
The second worm gear retaining pin is manufactured from wire and it is
most cost effective to manufacture this part on the final assembly line
by a guillotining operation. The bending of the pin is carried out
simultaneously to the part being inserted and secured.
CONCLUSIONS
1) Product re-design for ease of assembly creates worthwhile savings in
assembly costs. However, particularly for large products, these
cost savings must be offset against the additional tooling modification
costs for the manufacture of re-designed components.
2 ) When assembling a product which has :
a) Many parts
b) Many variants in the product family
c) A large annual production volume
d) Many common sub-assemblies
a hybrid flexible assembly system is required and it will combine manual, automatic and robotic assembly methods.
3) Sub-assemblies, having a fixed content, are always best assembled on dedicated automatic assembly machines.
4 ) Variable content sub-assemblies are most economically assembled using either
a) Assembly robots
b) Flexible free-transfer machines
5) Transfer between sub-assembly production units and final assembly
need large buffers to de-couple these two activities and reduce
downtime.
|
|
|
|