|
| 1
2
3
| >
>>
|
| 3 Comments / Subscribe To Comments |
| Published: Mar.23.2007 @ 8:18 pm
| Last edited: Mar.23.2007 @ 7:35 pm |
Recently bill orielly had gerald posner and bo dietl on his show to discredit charlie sheen for narrating a 9/11 truth movie that the owner of the mavericks want to give out to people. Throughout this segment Bill brings on two guest who both agree with him about his view of 9/11.
Gerald Posner wrote a book called "why America slept". This guys point of view means nothing seeing that he thinks that America was sleeping when 9/11 was happening. In fact its was more like the government was sleeping and Americans were up watching the event on the TV. Second off Posner and Dietl repeat what about the families and the victims and the fire fighters?
What about the family members that did not have their questions answered by the 9/11 commission? What about the families? They made a documentary how 9/11 was an inside job. There are a lot of interviews from fire fighters describing controlled demolition and bombs in the towers. Yeah what about them? What about the dieing first responders who entered the most toxic air imagined however our government told them it was safe.
These idiots at fox rely on the 9/11 official theory because they need their jobs and they need money.
Have you ever watched bill orielly have guests on that he agrees with completely? There was more than one guest and he offers no objective journalism. Why? He is not a journalist, he spreads propaganda. The same thing he accuses of the truth movement, he and fox do everyday.
Think about this, Tony Snow once had a show on fox and had been in news for some time. Now he is the press secretary to the President. Think of how well he has to be able to bullshit to make george bush sound good to the press. And he worked for fox news. |
|
| 2 Comments / Subscribe To Comments |
| Published: Mar.19.2007 @ 10:57 pm
| Last edited: Mar.19.2007 @ 10:23 pm |
Baghdad - Former Iraqi vice president Taha Yassin Ramadan was executed early Tuesday four years after the US-led invasion of Iraq, al-Iraqiya television reported quoting government officials.
Ramadan, who served in former leader Saddam Hussein's regime, was sentenced to death on February 12 for his role in the 1982 killing of 148 Shiites in Dujail, after a failed attempt on Saddam's life.
That is the text from this article. What was Saddam Hussein tried for? He was hung for his role in the 1982 killings 148 people, torture of women and children and the illegal arrest of 399 others.
Forgive me if I am wrong but he was the president of the country and someone tried to kill him. He is the president, maybe he knew who it was.
Did we invade Iraq because the had weapons of mass destruction? No, that was a lie. Did we go there because it would make America safer? No, its obvious the terror nest makes us less safe. Did we go to war because Saddam Hussein in his own country killed some people in relation to an attempt on his life? Is it possible to think that the 148 people in this incident compare anything to a full fledge war against a country in the middle of unrest and oil?
How is it possible with the smartest and brightest people on the planet, does an entire country get drug into a war made up of lie after lie. The cost of this war will bury this nation into the greatest debt at the cost of people who choose to not to learn from history. Money is made in war and all wars have helped the USA economy.
George Bush once told the press he reads a book everyday. Do you think that is the truth? Do you think he reads everyday? The ousting of CIA agents from the VP office. Fired federal prosecutors. Gag order on secret trials. Secret military trials where suspects confess to all the major crimes of recent history. Illegal phone tapping, watching Americans foreign bank accounts. The removal of habeas corpus. And this same administration, this same group of ideologist are explaining to you 9/11. Selling you a story that you have you don't have to believe. That just have to tell you. You know this because the official story is bogus by thought.
9/11 is the excuse for anything and everything. On both sides of the political spectrum it will be forever used as the reason to do anything.
Why the 9/11 official story is for dumb people.
In order for you to believe what happen to the 3 sky scrappers that fell that day, you have to remove the laws of physics and the laws of nature for a day. Then after 9/11 go back to using those fundamentals of how things work.
Buildings do not offer the same amount resistance than air. Random fire can not cause a building to collapse like a controlled demolition. |
|
| 2 Comments / Subscribe To Comments |
| Published: Feb.20.2007 @ 9:37 pm
| Last edited: Feb.20.2007 @ 8:41 pm |
http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2007/tst021907.htm
By Ron Paul
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke testifies twice every year before the congressional Financial Services committee, and I look forward to these opportunities to raise questions about monetary policy. I believe monetary policy is critically important yet overlooked in Washington. Money is the lifeblood of any economy, and control over a nation's currency means control over its economic well being. Fed bankers quite literally determine the value of our money, by controlling the supply of dollars and establishing interest rates. Their actions can make you richer or poorer overnight, in terms of the value of your savings and the buying power of your paycheck. So I urge all Americans to educate themselves about monetary policy, and better understand how a small group of unelected individuals at the Federal Reserve and Treasury department wield tremendous power over our lives.
The following are some excerpted comments from my opening remarks at the hearing with Mr. Bernanke:
Transparency in monetary policy is a goal we should all support. I've often wondered why Congress so willingly has given up its prerogative over monetary policy. Astonishingly, Congress in essence has ceded total control over the value of our money to a secretive central bank.
Congress, although not by law, essentially has given up all its oversight responsibility over the Federal Reserve. There are no true audits, and Congress knows nothing of the conversations, plans, and actions taken in concert with other central banks. We get less and less information regarding the money supply each year, especially now that M3 is no longer reported.
The role the Fed plays in the President's secretive Working Group on Financial Markets goes unnoticed by members of Congress. The Federal Reserve shows no willingness to inform Congress voluntarily about how often the Working Group meets, what actions it takes that affect the financial markets, or why it takes those actions.
But these actions, directed by the Federal Reserve, alter the purchasing power of our money. And that purchasing power is always reduced. The dollar today is worth only four cents compared to the dollar in 1913, when the Federal Reserve started. This has profound consequences for our economy and our political stability. All paper currencies are vulnerable to collapse, and history is replete with examples of great suffering caused by such collapses, especially to a nation's poor and middle class. This leads to political turmoil.
Government officials consistently claim that inflation is in check at barely 2%, but middle class Americans know that their purchasing power--especially when it comes to housing, energy, medical care, and school tuition-- is shrinking much faster than 2% each year.
We look at GDP numbers to reassure ourselves that all is well, yet a growing number of Americans still do not enjoy the higher standard of living that monetary inflation brings to the privileged few. Those few have access to the newly created money first, before its value is diluted.
For example: Before the breakdown of the Bretton Woods system, CEO income was about 30 times the average worker's pay. Today, it's closer to 500 times. It's hard to explain this simply by market forces and increases in productivity. One Wall Street firm last year gave out bonuses totaling $16.5 billion. There's little evidence that this represents free market capitalism.
In 2006 dollars, the minimum wage was $9.50 before the 1971 breakdown of Bretton Woods. Today that dollar is worth $5.15. Congress congratulates itself for raising the minimum wage by mandate, but in reality it has lowered the minimum wage by allowing the Fed to devalue the dollar. We must consider how the growing inequalities created by our monetary system will lead to social discord.
How can a policy of steadily debasing our currency be defended morally, knowing what harm it causes to those who still believe in saving money and assuming responsibility for themselves in their retirement years? Is it any wonder we are a nation of debtors rather than savers?
We need more transparency in how the Federal Reserve carries out monetary policy, and we need it soon. |
|
| 0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments |
| Published: Dec.22.2006 @ 1:03 pm
| Last edited: Dec.22.2006 @ 12:54 pm |
Military Draft System To Be Tested - They are making plans to test the draft system, but that doesn't mean they want to use it, unless congress or the president need it. Lets see, our government wants to go to war with everyone. Even though the public do not support the war, lets get the draft test ready just in case, but don't worry, there is no chance we will go to war, is there? If there is a draft, I will do like bush and Clinton, i will dodge the draft, never to return to this country of the federal reserve fraud system.
Bush's presidential library - George Bush is a loser, liar and a traitor. But wait, since he is president, lets give him a presidential library because he is so deserving. I hope they put the names of the dead soldiers on a wall mount in his library along with the half a million Iraq's killed since the illegal invasion of Iraq. People who support a presidential library for bush support wars made out of lies and tax breaks for the rich. Screw you George Bush, the founding fathers would have smacked you in the face for being such a dumb son of a bitch.
Bush Concedes Iraq War More Difficult Than He Expected - Yeah Bush its just another one of those things you got wrong. Don't forget to put that in your library. This dumb ass said that the mission was accomplished, a long time ago. Turns out that was another mind trick for the American people. Bush lets start a more difficult war or should I say wars. Lets go to war with the world, then you could use the draft for sure. Did you know over 600,000 Iraq civilians have died in this war?
A Victory For Free Speech - Is a lose for the people. The title of this article is bullshit. This victory allows ads advocating for an issue and mentioning candidates can run during an election, creating a loophole in the law that sought to control the power of big money in elections. The problem is the people with more money can manipulate and create more ads for a given agenda. God forbid the people made a decision without a push from the lobby.
Rice says Iraq worth the investment - OK so we believe what rice says then, right? If that is so, listen to what rice has to say about Iraq threats just a year before the illegal invasion.
Marines Face Charges for Deaths of Iraqi Civilians - Ahh bush, yet another reason to stay the course in Iraq. Why don't you tell the guys who have served 4 tours to go back and serve another one. If George Bush is not impeached the end of America will soon follow.
North Korea nuclear talks end without agreement (2nd Roundup) - Why does the United State fear every country in the world that has nuclear weapons? We are the #1 nuclear threat to the world with more WMD than anyone. If we can develop nuclear weapons why cant everyone else? Did the gods anoint us the be the keepers of the world? Go ahead USA, oppress the world with your thoughts and idea any. Get on with the one world government already. I am tired of waiting.
|
|
| 0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments |
| Published: Sep.06.2006 @ 11:10 am
| Last edited: Sep.06.2006 @ 2:35 pm |
There has been a lot of talk about Katie Couric going from the morning show lies to the evening show lies. With all of this hype, deep down, who really cares? Is she going to change the world? The guys who write the teleprompter for the evening news are the same. And yeah they might right it different for Katie's taste, however she doesn't create the news. The news is going to be the same propaganda bullshit it has always been. Katie Couric is not going to change news.
Do you want me to rate her. I give her a F. She has failed me and many others, just like any news agency that thinks what they announce to the world everyday will change their life. If Katie Couric wants to do something for the world, maybe she or the news industry should try as a hole to bring the important issues to the front and give those issues the same attention, that was given to a women who, to simply put it, just changed her job.
Are we to be this excited for someone just because they changed their jobs? Why don't they do something instead of spreading useless propaganda. Most of the news sucks and is disinformation anyway.
Like I have told you women and men, if 9/11 was done by 19 hijackers, why are 7 or more of them alive and yet the FBI has not updated its list. As we get closer to the anniversary of the inside job, watch how the news especially milk 9/11 for all its worth. There are so many holes in the official story it is scary to believe that smart Americans do not take the time to look at what many others have found to be true.
False flag terror operations have been going on since the Battleship Maine in 1898. In 1910 congress allowed funding that would bring Maine up from the depths. When it reached the surface, many test were done and the ship was examined thoroughly. Then it was proved that the Maine have blown up from within the ship, meaning that the explosion that came from inside the ship could not have carried out by the Spanish, an inside job. Read about it here. Learn the truth, false flag inside jobs are created by government to spread their agendas and to start wars for profit. |
|
| 0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments |
| Published: Aug.02.2006 @ 1:02 pm
| Last edited: Aug.02.2006 @ 12:09 pm |
Evidence collected during the investigation into the deaths of 24 Iraqis in the western town of Haditha supports accusations US Marines deliberately shot civilians, a US defence department official said.
Agents from the Naval Criminal Investigative Service have completed their initial inquiry into the incident last November. Further investigations may be ordered after Marine Corps and Navy prosecutors review the evidence and determine whether to recommend criminal charges, according to Pentagon officials who discussed the matter on condition of anonymity. The decision on whether to bring criminal charges will be made by the commander of the Marines' unit. The Marines reported after the incident on November 19 that 15 Iraqi civilians had been killed by a makeshift roadside bomb and in crossfire during a battle between Marines and insurgents. In March, Time magazine published a report based on accounts from survivors and human rights groups suggesting that the killings were deliberate acts by the Marines against unarmed civilians including woman and children. A criminal investigation was then ordered by the top Marine commander in Iraq, Major General Richard Zilmer. A second investigation is looking into whether officers in the Marines' chain of command tried to cover up the events. That inquiry, which has not yet been made public, criticises some officers for failing to pursue obvious discrepancies in the initial reports about what happened in Haditha. |
|
| 0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments |
| Published: Aug.02.2006 @ 8:50 am
| Last edited: Aug.03.2006 @ 3:09 pm |
Mel Gibson got drunk and who gives a shit? Is there anything more important for the news to look at other than this horse shit? 9/11 panel talked of Pentagon lies, EPA Misled Public on 9/11 Pollution, 9/11 Impaired Firefighters' Lungs, Third of Americans suspect 9-11 government conspiracy.
The USA is not neutral in the Lebanon war with Israel. The US sends equipment and information to its ally. The problem is Bush says end the conflict, Blair supports Israel's move deeper into Lebanon. The war between Israel and Hezbollah has gone on for too long. Hezbollah has rockets or hand held weapons. They do not have a Naval yard, they do not have air craft or anything compared to Israel. So why is Israel content on blowing the shit out of Lebanon? Same reason the US invaded Iraq and Afghanistan, because they can.
In Israels having this war with a weak and small opposition, the prove they can kill anyone whenever they want. Israel should feel real safe now. I bet everyone likes them for fighting a just and needed war.
Why is Israel not to be trusted? Because LBJ, the president that took over after JFK was was assassinated by his own Government, purposely parked the USS Liberty in international waters to have it be attacked by Israel(1). Why would LBJ want to sink the Liberty? Why would Israel bomb a ship they knew was an ally? Get your guns, its time for a war somewhere. |
|
| 0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments |
| Published: Jul.29.2006 @ 12:52 am
|
| No mention of a large, commercial-class aircraft loitering in the restricted airspace of lower Manhattan during the strikes on the WTC towers will be found in the 9/11 Commission Report. It does not appear in any version of the Official Story. It is largely unknown even in critical studies of 9/11. Yet substantial evidence exists to support its presence coincident with the attacks, actually orbiting in close proximity to the towers for several minutes while the North Tower burned and the South Tower was struck. Photography, video footage and eyewitness accounts, including FDNY transcripts and mainstream media audio, confirm this fact. Why is this significant? Let us consider the commercial air traffic on a typical Tuesday morning over New York City. There are three major airports servicing the city: La Guardia and JFK International to the east, and Newark International across the Hudson to the west. Normal holding patterns for these airports do not intersect the borough of Manhattan at any point. Lower Manhattan is, and was on the morning of 9/11/01, a low-altitude flight-restricted (no fly) zone
for commercial jets, as designated by the FAA, for the obvious reason that heavy, fast-moving aircraft and tall buildings pose mutual hazards. Air traffic near the WTC towers was doubly restricted, with a minimum ceiling extending two thousand feet above the towers (3,300 feet) within a radius of one nautical mile, excepting only police aviation without special permit. These were the VFR (visual flight rules) parameters in effect on the morning of 9/11. Once WTC1 was hit, the black smoke plume expanding southeast from the tower would pose an additional threat to navigation.
No avoidance warning from Air Traffic Control would be necessary, as no rational commercial pilot (no matter how curious) would risk his aircraft, crew or passengers in a "fly-by" of the burning North Tower. But in this anonymous Camera Planet segment we see a large, twin-jet aircraft (757/767-class) doing just that at approximately 8:58am (assuming the time signature is uncorrected by one hour), five minutes before WTC2 will be struck. Even disregarding the indicated time, as WTC1 is burning and WTC2 is not, the segment is clearly recorded between 8:46am and 9:03am. Note this white aircraft with dark engines and vertical stabilizer is not the aircraft that will impact WTC2. |
|
| 0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments |
| Published: Jul.06.2006 @ 12:17 am
| Last edited: Jul.12.2006 @ 10:50 pm |
Kenneth Lay who should have went down with countless other big energy company CEO' died recently. In dying he forfeits the chance to pay back a small bit of dignity. He deserved to die in jail, and I wouldn't have minded my tax dollars going towards the jailing of that worthless being.
This guy who was found guilty of losing many lives and many retirements. He would spend the rest of his life in jail unless Bush didn't pardon him or unless he died. Luckily for him he died of "heart failure".
Did you know Kenneth Lay / Enron was Bush's biggest political contributor? George H. W. Bush went to his funeral. George H. W. Bush is war mongering and lier as well. After the Enron scandal bush 2 acted like he didn't know Kenneth Lay. Bush and Lay were close. See through the lies, wake up. Look it up.
Did you know Dick Cheney has heart problems? |
|
| 0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments |
| Published: Jul.03.2006 @ 5:25 pm
|
By Rosemary Bennett and Michael Evans
| |
 |
PRESIDENT BUSH had plans to lure Saddam Hussein into war by flying an aircraft over Iraq painted in UN colours in the hope he would shoot it down, a book reveals.
Mr Bush told Tony Blair of the extraordinary plan during a meeting in the White House on January 31, 2003, six weeks before the war started, according to an updated version of Lawless World by Philippe Sands, a human rights lawyer. He says the President made it clear that he had already decided to go to war, despite still pressing for a UN resolution.
“The US was thinking of flying U2 reconnaissance aircraft with fighter cover over Iraq, painted in UN colours. If Saddam fired on them, he would be in breach,” the book reports Mr Bush telling Mr Blair at the meeting.
If the U2 idea was a serious proposal, it would have made sense only if the spy plane was ordered to fly at an altitude within range of Iraqi missiles. Mr Bush’s reference in the recorded conversation to the U2 being escorted by fighter aircraft indicates that that is what he had in mind.
The U2, America’s most sophisticated aerial reconnaissance aircraft, can operate at 90,000ft, taking high-resolution photographs of targets. At this altitude, the U2 would have been beyond the range of Iraqi surface-to-air missiles.
U2s were made available to the UN weapons inspectors to help them in their search for Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction (WMD). But there has never been any suggestion until now that Mr Bush had thought about painting one of them in UN colours to deceive Saddam.
Later in the same meeting the President said it was also possible that a defector could be brought out who would give a public presentation about Saddam’s WMD, and there was a small possibility that Saddam would be assassinated.
The book also claims that the President “thought it unlikely that there would be internecine warfare between the different religious and ethnic groups”.
President Bush also made clear, according to the book which was featured on Channel 4 News, that he would go to war irrespective of whether there was a second UN resolution.
“The US would put its full weight behind efforts to get another resolution and would ‘twist arms’ and ‘even threaten’. But he had to say that if, ultimately, we failed, military action would follow anyway,” the book said.
The section of the book is based on a memo of the meeting. Mr Blair responded that he was “solidly with the President and ready to do whatever it took to disarm Saddam”. But the Prime Minister said that a second Security Council resolution would provide an insurance policy against the unexpected, and international cover, including with the Arabs. | | http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,11069-2023128,00.html |
|
Current Page 1
1
2
3
| >
>>
|
|
|